Why The Sun Will Nova | Enter The Galactic Current Sheet
Part 2 of Doug Vogt, The Sun Will Nova In 22 Years
This is Part 2 of our last article, Doug Vogt, The Sun Will Nova In 22 Years | Discovering The Reason. You will want to read that one and this one builds on it.
We went into detail in part 1, to understand the basic evidence of a solar cyclical nova, using Doug Vogt’s video
Series 4, Part 2, Causes of the Ice Ages, Scientific Proof our Sun Novas
Nova Triggers & Galactic Wave Kickers
We discovered the Scientific Proof our Sun Novas video because we are looking at the latest video, compiling Suspicious Observers theory of a cyclical solar nova from our sun.
The Catastrophe Evidence
This newsletter exists, to confirm a solid timeline, related to the likelihood of a Geomagnetic Excursion or full reversal, within the next 40 years. Doug Vogt discovered the evidence of a cyclical nova coinciding with geomagnetic excursion cycles, approx. 12,600 years apart. The evidentiary bottom line is nova-level isotopes found in 12,000-year layers of geological formational records.
How A Star Nova’s
Voyager was shut down for a while. NASA had to deal with a dust overload, as the probe encountered far more dust than anticipated.
Dust accumulating around a star will cause it to blow the dust off at some point, resulting in a nova. A magnetic kick also triggers a nova. The magnetic excursion offers both.
A Turbulent Kick To The Solar System
Voyager also recorded greater turbulence than expected. This turbulence is from a wave of energy, emanating from the center of the galaxy, bringing dusty plasma into our solar system.
Please review The Catastrophe Evidence, and Series 4, Part 2, Causes of the Ice Ages, Scientific Proof our Sun Novas, at your leisure.
Proof Of The Galactic Wave | 2 Models
Magnetic Pole Shift - More and More Evidence
We are going to get our feet wet, in the wading area, of the deep pool of geomagnetic science. The thermohydrogravidynamic theory (cosmic geophysics based on a researcher’s generalized differential formulations of the first law of thermodynamics for an individual finite continuum region τ considered in a Galilean frame of reference), is so new, you can be forgiven if you haven’t heard of it yet.
It is based on measuring gravitational magnetic pressure exerted throughout the galaxy, interacting with Earth.
Mathematical Extrapolation
This is the good old fashioned way of determining what will happen and why.
Extrapolation Graph
As we know, extrapolation is a process of predicting the data point about the outside of a curve when a few points are given. In the example given below, the known data are x1, x2, x3. Finding the point x4 is known as extrapolation point.
We are predicting what X4 will be, based on X’s 1,2, and 3. Our evidence of entrance into a cyclical geomagnetic excursion now is a more complex use of mathematical extrapolation.
This method serves to uncover these basic observations.
The Thermohydrogravidynamic Model | Cosmic Geophysics
This model confirms our solar system entering the galactic wave causing significant changes in our magnetic field.
We have seen this wave coming by one method, and here is a second model. It is called the Thermohydrogravidynamic Model. The Parker Instability factor, explained in The Catastrophe Evidence video in our two articles, affects the field’s magnetic and plasma interaction and produces waves of energy from the center of the galaxy, pictured below.
One of these waves enters our solar system approximately every 12,600 years, according to Doug Vogt’s mathematical extrapolation estimate. Thermohydrogravidynamics sees the waves as a part of the electromagnetic spectrum that can be measured in the Interplanetary Magnetic field, and the solar and galactic fields, to determine Earth’s long-term cycles. The ability to do this is new and the models for doing it are newer.
The Convincing Cosmic Energy Gravitational Genesis of the Strongest Geomagnetic Anomalies of the Magnetic Field of the Earth
Sergey V. Simonenko *
This is the theory at work. Check out this latest study. I will try to analyze the abstract only for us, to grasp the simple basics in this awesome study.
It is a followup study to his previous one published in 2014.
The Cosmic Energy Gravitational Genesis of the
Forthcoming Intensifications of the Global
Seismotectonic, Volcanic, Climatic and Magnetic
Activities Since 2016 AD
From The Convincing Cosmic Energy Gravitational Genesis, Abstract
The author presents convincing evidence of the cosmic (planetary and solar) energy gravitational origin (related to the maximal and minimal combined planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influences on the internal rigid core of the Earth) of the maximal temporal intensifications of the global magnetic processes of the Earth.
In other words, the magnetic cycles of Earth are a product of the, combined planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influences, acting on the internal rigid core of the Earth. They function within a range of intensifications which can be anticipated, because of the way the magnetic system must function to operate the way it does and not go haywire. So if it fluctuates one way by a certain measured degree, if the theory is correct it must adjust within a certain timeframe, and that adjustment will cause another change according to its magnitude and energetic properties. At some point, the magnetic field reverses to remain in integral long-term calibration with the galaxy and solar system. This change is signaled, and triggered, and the gravitational influences on the internal rigid core of the Earth, can be anticipated, then measured, and recorded at the magnetic reversal entry point, if the Thermohydrogravidynamics theory is true.
Abstract, Anticip……………………………………ation
So this study is a grand boast. The theory anticipated, that certain dates would register significant changes if we were entering a magnetic reversal point. From the abstract.
In fairly good agreement with the calculated date 2007.416666666 AD(of thelocal minimal planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influence on the internal rigid core), it was observed the very rapid changes of the geomagnetic field near the date March 2007 AD (corresponding approximatelyto19-20 April 2007 AD). This fairly good agreement gives the additional convincing argument that the date March 2007 AD can be considered as the possible beginning of the geomagnetic reversal during the evaluated range (2007÷2216) AD.
Two anticipated, measured readings are described.
The strong magnetic anomaly occurred on 6 January 2020 AD in perfect agreement with the calculated date 2020.016666667 AD (corresponding to 6 January 2020 AD) related to the local maximal planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influence on the internal rigid core.
In fairly good agreement with the calculated date 2023.26666666 AD (corresponding approximately to 7 April 2023 AD) of the local maximal planetary and solar integral energy gravitational influence on the internal rigid core, it was observed the strongest (during the last 6 years) magnetic anomaly on 23 March 2023 AD.
These convincing agreements demonstrate the physical validity of the established global prediction thermohydrogravidynamic principles, which can be considered as the proven physical basis for the development of the general unified geophysical theory (describing the possible geomagnetic reversal during the evaluated range (2007 ÷ 2216) AD) combining the Special Theory of Relativity, the relativistic electrodynamics and the relativistic theory of the non-stationary gravitation, which can be developed based on the established physical analogy between the establishedbrelation for the energy flux (of the gravitational energy) and the Lorentz’s calibration condition (for the vector potential related with the scalar potential of the non-stationary electromagnetic field).
Let’s look at the Lorentz’s calibration condition (for the vector potential related with the scalar potential of the non-stationary electromagnetic field).
The Earth is replete with electrically conducting fluids. The Lorentz calibration device, calibrates the field for adjusting the flow of fluids.
Lorentz’s calibration definition
Lorentz’s calibration definition, in the context provided, refers to the process of adjusting and verifying the accuracy of the Lorentz force flowmeter (LFF), a measuring device that utilizes localized static magnetic fields for the non-contact measurement of the flow rate in electrically conducting fluids. This calibration becomes challenging when dealing with aggressive or high-temperature conductive fluids, as it is difficult to reproduce the typical application conditions in a laboratory setting. In the case of an LFF used for open channel flow measurement in liquid aluminum, a robust calibration method is adapted to address these difficulties.
Sergey V. Simonenko concludes in the study that he, anticipated, and measured the calculated dates. by, utilizing localized static magnetic fields for the non-contact measurement of the flow rate in electrically conducting fluids, flowing in the Earth. Based on those measurements he determined how the interplanetary/galactic field had changed to significantly affect the unified field calibration change required to affect the flow of those fluids. on that date.
Study’s Timeline For Events
As you can see, there is no predictor for the onset of extreme weather events in this timeline. The timeline appears to reflect the time period between reversal onset and return to full magnetic strength. It anticipates an approx. 6,000-year, magnetic excursion half cycle.
Therefore the mathematical extrapolation model we have been working from is well within the framework of this model, although using a different method of analysis. 100 to 200 years is a normal cited estimate for extreme weather events creating flooding, volcanoes, earthquakes, and brief glaciation to much of the Earth, before returning to maximum conditions, after a solar micronova from our sun.
Thanks For Reading and Stay Safe