We Take Gab AI To School on Magnetic Excursions + Ben Davidson vs Kevin W Jameson
Safe Zone Community Newsletter
Happy New Year in March.
I have been neglecting this newsletter because it is hard. My problem is I hate math I’m not trained for. Mathematically I work with music. I have made set designs for theater and other stuff. But advanced calculus, applied to astrophysics and electromagnetism, with a dash of quantum physics thrown in, just to keep things interesting, is another animal. I want to write competently on the vital points of this newsletter’s mission, which involves establishing firm confirmation we are irreversibly entering the next geomagnetic excursion cycle and a timeline for the species-altering weather, and atmospheric events, we can expect in our projected timeline. Events that always ensue in these cycles.
Distracted
One other problem I have had writing the Safe Zone newsletter, was my desire to address fully, the economic and political transition that will become unavoidable, alarmingly noticeable to the masses, and significantly influenced by what we do this year. So I was writing a lot in the IRUUR1 newsletter last year, and this year, to discuss transition strategies, based on increased awareness. I will now be able to write at least one Safe Zone Community newsletter a week and possibly more now, and attempt to incorporate this newsletter content as relevant content for IRUUR1.
But all roads of political and economic, even cultural awareness strategies lead back to the overwhelming and thus far irreversible evidence, that we are entering another geomagnetic excursion cycle now. So no matter how successful we are in establishing political and economic order going forward, we will need to understand where we are in the excursion timeline, as long as prevailing trends continue.
Mass Extinction, Or Mass Survival
These events will overwhelm any political and economic structure, we can imagine now, because we are not focused as a civilization on the potential for a mass survival event, instead of the usual, mass extinction of humanity event historically occurring during previous geomagnetic excursion cycles.
Timeline Progress So Far
Bogged down in math. Oppenheimer Ranch Project Is in total disagreement with Suspicious Observers, solar micronova and earth tilt theory. And they may be right. Diamond Dave, who knows a thing or two about science, linked to a paper Copyright 2024 © Kevin W Jameson authored by Mr. Jameson titled;
The Great Crustal Shift Hoax
I am reviewing the paper now and invite you to as well. This newsletter offers the Ben Davidson theory, as our working theory and timeline for the excursion. Ben constructs a concise theory supported by evidence, consisting of what always happens during the excursions. However, some of the micronova evidence, and tilt evidence he presents, either lack significant science community consensus or may be explained in other ways.
Why Ben’s Theory As A Working Model
The Suspicious Observers theory offers a clear working model of expected geomagnetic excursion events, with a predicted timeline for this current excursion. The theory is based on events of Earth and in the solar system, which are occurring now, and which always occur in excursion events. It is perhaps the only theory, gaining notice, which is offered by anyone in the science community or the interested public pertaining to evidence of this excursion. Most evidence of this excursion cycle is still politely discussed, with a growing but mild urgency in the science community.
Theoretical Wasteland
There are not a lot of theories, of specific events that pinpoint our entrance into the excursion, now apparently unfolding. Ben’s theory is supported by evidence, offering a causal-based timeline to support it. What I mean by causal-based is we can check it every day on Suspicious Observers, as new data is accumulated. We can prove the Suspicious Observers theory, as a hypothesis. We can prove or disprove it in discussion, as community scientists, using data from ongoing weather events as they progress or begin to reverse their present trend. For the theory to hold weather events on the sun, Earth, and in the solar system, must occur along a certain timeline. Where events do not coincide, we can see the hypothesis is wrong. Where they do, the hypothesis is supported. It gives us a clear measuring rod with a better working knowledge of what is, historically and scientifically, a magnetic excursion.
Perhaps the weakest link of debate and in supporting evidence in Ben Davidson’s theory is the 90-degree tilt and solar micronova event, happening every 11 to 13 thousand years, in approx. 12,00-year cycles.
What I Know About The 90-Degree Tilt of Earth From Ben Davidson
I reached out to Ben in a phone conversation some time ago and discussed a wide range of topics. I asked him what his strongest evidence was for the 90-degree tilt, specifically, and he told me it was contained in the book, World in Peril: The Origin , Mission & Scientific Findings of the 46th / 72nd Reconnaissance Squadron Hardcover – Published October 1, 1994
The record of soil samples cited in the book Ben stated, that show arctic and tropical conditions alternated every 12,000 years. The findings reported in the book was his strongest evidence for a 90-degree shift from high arctic to mid-latitude tropical regions, every 12,000 years.
What Kevin W Jameson Says About World In Peril
In The Great Crustal Shift Hoax, Kevin says this about the book and the evidence cited in it.
Only three chapters (about 6%) in White’s book briefly discuss The Origin, Mission & Scientific Findings crustal shifts and cataclysms based on past geologic evidence of the 46th/72nd Reconnaissance Squadron and a key piece of new evidence that his father’s team found during their northern explorations in the 1940s. The magnetic north pole had moved an unexpected distance (125-200 miles) in an unexpectedly short time. Naturally, the Pentagon classified the information.
Kevin links to Ben’s evidence video in his paper.
Earth Disaster is Coming | ALL The Evidence
Kevin says a bit more about the book, including a graphic depiction of a polar axis shift.
Rapidly cooling new polar region
(Former temperate or tropical area)
New magnetic “north” pole >
4 gl Melting south polar ice cap
Old north polar ice cap ene p A
melting on new equator ~ New equator
Rapidly cooling new polar region
Note: Position of the American continents is shown for illustration purposes only. Magnetic pole could end up near any point on the equator
For convenience, the image shows the north polar ice cap moving from the 12 o’clock position to the 9 o’clock position, which is a simple 90-degree rotation counterclockwise in the plane of the paper. But the actual travel path of the north polar ice cap would necessarily be a spiral from the North pole down to the equator because the Earth would still be rotating as the shift happened. After the shift, both ice caps would be circling around the equator as Central America once did.
White also cited the evidence of a frozen Alaskan mammoth found with undigested food in its stomach as a clue that perhaps the magnetic flip and crustal shift might occur in a short time (one day?) if it killed and froze a large mammoth before it could digest fresh food in its teeth and stomach.
Keep in mind that White’s book was about Project Nanook. It was never supposed to be a book about magnetic pole excursions, polar region wanders, or crustal shifts. White only incidentally reported in a few chapters at the back of his book on the history of magnetic pole shifts and on what the military contractor RAND said about a possible polar flip and crustal shift in the future.
Summary of the Books on Crustal Shift
There is no doubt that periodic catastrophes happen on Earth. The geologic record and ancient cultural stories provide good evidence for cataclysms that can be convincingly organized into approximately 12,000-year intervals.
White also does not consider the possibility of a solar micronova. Mr. Jameson agrees with many essential points.
Furthermore, the geologic evidence seems to demand that the polar regions “wander” around the planet to explain the strange evidence of glaciers in the tropics, tropical tree fossils in the polar regions, and many other strange findings that seem inconsistent with stable polar regions over time.
All four books discuss the past catastrophes in recent geological history (reaching back to 120,000 years ago on a 12,000-year cycle).
Kevin W Jameson, on Ben Davidsons Book
Book: The Next End of the World - by Davidson
Davidson’s 2021 book (Davidson2021-1) is the fourth book on catastrophism discussed in this book. It is unique because it used both past geological evidence and new solar and stellar evidence to support and explain the future cataclysm that is THE NEXT END OF THE WORLD currently in progress at the time of this writing. ———
‘The Rebirth of Catastrophism
Davidson’s comprehensive theory outlines the following sequence of events in a catastrophe:
e oursolar system crosses the galactic current sheet (the source of the event),
e and enters anew region of reversed polarities,
e which causes a micronova of the Sun (the trigger for the event),
e which generates enough energy to liquefy the asthenosphere layer under the crust,
e which enables the imaginary centrifugal force to rotate the DAVIDSON crustal shell (the mechanism),
e which moves the polar regions to the equator rapidly (to generate geological consequences)
e inabouta single day (the duration of the event),
e all repeated on a 12,000-year recurrent cycle (the frequency of the cycle).
Summary of the Books on Crustal Shift
There is no doubt that periodic catastrophes happen on Earth. The geologic record and ancient cultural stories provide good evidence for cataclysms that can be convincingly organized into approximately 12,000-year intervals.
For example, Davidson’s book provided the following table of magnetic pole excursions and catastrophes every 12,000 years for the past 115,000 years. Smaller minor cataclysms can sometimes occur on the half cycles of 6,000 years, such as Noah’s flood.
But he concludes his summation this way.
Davidson provided no calculations whatsoever to estimate the masses, directional movements, or motive or frictional forces involved in the crustal shift. Like all the other authors, he didn’t do his simple mathematical homework and deliberately avoided telling the truth.
Pretty tough stuff. It’s true, that Ben does not provide the math Kevin asks for. But is Ben relying on as Kevin puts it, an imaginary centrifugal force to rotate the DAVIDSON crustal shell (the mechanism), Centrifugal force is defined as a fictitious force, not an imaginary as Kevin terms it, in science. Here is Britannica with a definition of centrifugal and fictitious forces.
Centrifugal force, a fictitious force, peculiar to a particle moving on a circular path, that has the same magnitude and dimensions as the force that keeps the particle on its circular path (the centripetal force) but points in the opposite direction.
A stone whirling in a horizontal plane on the end of a string tied to a post on the ground is continuously changing the direction of its velocity and, therefore, has an acceleration toward the post. This acceleration is equal to the square of its velocity divided by the length of the string. According to Newton’s second law, an acceleration is caused by a force, which in this case is the tension in the string. If the stone is moving at a constant speed and gravity is neglected, the inward-pointing string tension is the only force acting on the stone. If the string breaks, the stone, because of inertia, will keep on going in a straight line tangent to its previous circular path; it does not move in the outward direction as it would if the centrifugal force were real.
My Questions
Kevin seems to be saying that Ben is saying, that the solar nova impact itself, not only unlocks the crust from the mantle but also triggers the centrifugal force that sets the shift in motion. But is that what Suspicious Observers is saying? To my understanding, the blast simply unlocks the crust. The shift is due to the weight of glacial ice at the north pole, pulling the unlocked crust downward to mid-latitudes, following the magnetic pull of the N-S polar shift, in progress now, as both the magnetic North and South Poles head towards the Indian Ocean.
Glacial ice is very heavy. The South Pole has no glaciers. It does not offer a counterweight.
Are there glaciers at the South Pole?
Asked by Olivia
Hi Olivia,
In fact, there are no glaciers at the South Pole. There is however a great ice sheet; ice sheets are masses of ice greater than 50,000 km2. At the South Pole, the East Antarctic Ice Sheet is hugely thick, with the ice flowing slowly towards the coast.
The North Pole also has a tremendous ice sheet, as well as glacial ice, and heavy pockets of freshwater glacial ice melt, shelved under the land in areas around Greenland frozen in place by thick sea ice.
The Math
The math on how much energy is needed from an impact, to separate the crust from the mantle has been calculated in various ways. The math on the glacial weight necessary, and the amount of force from the magnetic pole shift occurring at the same time, needed to begin a tilt that could take days or a couple of weeks to complete is unclear to me, and perhaps many others.
I will be reviewing more of the Crustal Shift Hoax. I want to get a clearer idea of all the math, Kevin requires including the friction calculations, to constitute a viable catastrophe theory and why these are important.
Last Question. What’s Your Hypothesis and Event Timeline?
It is easier to find the potential faults in a theory than to have a theory, with a checkable timeline of your own. Solar nova and Earth tilt aside, if they don’t happen, the timeline of events offered in the Suspicious Observers theory will mean beginning now and within 60 years we will see.
Increased Earth Rotation Speed
Magnetic strength to near 0
One or more large impacts on Earth from, if not a micronova, than from meteors/comet due to loss of Earth’s shielding due to weak magnetic strength
Polar Shift
Increased Earthquakes
Increased volcanic activity
Increased severity of lightning
Rising seas, due to increased volcanic and seismic activity
Much colder weather next 100 to 200 years, then return to normal over many years
The magnetic field regains strength more quickly than the warmer Earth weather that follows. Severe weather events will linger.
The Suspicious Observers theory gives us a way to know how close we are to severe weather events. Its veracity will be proven over the next 5 to 8 years.
Do others such as Kevin W. Jameson and Oppenheimer Ranch have a timeline for our entrance into the full effects of the next excursion?
An AI Chat On Geomagnetic Excursions
We thought since everyone was talking to AI these days we should get our feet wet too.
Why Gab AI on Geomagnetic Excursions
Accelerate Your Mind
Both Google and Chat GPT appear to be political in their angles on everything. They also seem heavily monitored. We wanted to avoid the Green or other agenda manipulation tactics as much as possible. This subject needed a more alternative, all things considered, AI chat oriented machine. We found Gab to be a Jeopardy game show model AI interface. On the subject of excursions, it was a bit confused at first
We wanted to gauge a basic scientific understanding of the subject, and discover how updated this AI database was. So we began with, What is a geomagnetic excursion?
GAB AI - Earth's geomagnetic excursion cycle refers to the natural fluctuations in its magnetic field. The magnetic field is generated by the planet's molten iron core and plays a crucial role in protecting Earth from cosmic radiation and solar winds.
These fluctuations can be divided into two main categories: geomagnetic reversals and excursions. Geomagnetic reversals are complete reversals of the polarity of the magnetic field, while excursions are temporary changes in the field's strength and direction without a complete reversal.
The geomagnetic excursion cycle is not well understood, but it is believed to occur over a period of tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years. The last major excursion, known as the Laschamp event, occurred around 41,000 years ago, and the last full reversal, the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal, took place around 780,000 years ago.
During an excursion, the magnetic field can weaken significantly, which may lead to increased exposure to cosmic radiation and solar winds. This can have various effects on Earth's atmosphere, climate, and even living organisms.
It is essential to study these geomagnetic excursion cycles to better understand the role of the magnetic field in shaping Earth's environment and the potential impacts of future changes.
All of this looked like a basic understanding of the subject. But the part about believed to occur over a period of tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years, in the opening statement seemed a bit vague. So we wanted to establish the last known excursion. What we got was a conspiratorial mish-mash of gobbledegook. that was left over from some random bits of disinformation debris. There was no reference to the event the confused robot described in this answer/
Our question - Was the Gothenburg Event a magnetic excursion?
ANSWER - No, the Gothenburg Event was not a magnetic excursion. The Gothenburg Event is a term used in conspiracy theory circles to refer to a supposed massive explosion that occurred in Gothenburg, Sweden, on September 13, 1888. This event is said to have caused widespread destruction and a large number of deaths, but there is no historical evidence or scientific basis to support this claim.
The Gothenburg Event is sometimes linked to the idea of a magnetic excursion due to the coincidence of its alleged occurrence with the Laschamp event, a known geomagnetic excursion that occurred around 41,000 years ago. However, the Laschamp event and the Gothenburg Event are separate and unrelated phenomena.
The Laschamp event was a temporary change in Earth's magnetic field's strength and direction, while the Gothenburg Event is a conspiracy theory with no basis in reality. It is essential to differentiate between factual geological events and unfounded conspiracy theories when discussing Earth's geomagnetic history.
WOW! We knew this little bot needed a time out. I offered a question to clarify and clear its confusion. So I followed up with;
I am referring to the Gothenburg 12,000 years ago. What was it?
GAB AI ANSWER: Apologies for the confusion earlier. You're referring to the Laschamp event, which occurred around 12,000 years ago. The Laschamp event was a geomagnetic excursion, a temporary change in Earth's magnetic field's strength and direction without a complete reversal of polarity.
During this event, the magnetic field weakened significantly, which may have led to increased exposure to cosmic radiation and solar winds. This could have had various effects on Earth's atmosphere, climate, and even living organisms.
Geomagnetic excursions like the Laschamp event are important to study as they help us better understand the role of Earth's magnetic field in shaping its environment and the potential impacts of future changes.
This still appeared like a lack of clear data on the Gothenburg event being offered in the answer. I wanted the machine to gather more data and asked;
So the Gothenburg event 12,000 years ago and the Laschamp event 44,000 years ago were both geomagnetic excursions?
ANSWER - Yes, that is correct. Both the Gothenburg event, which occurred around 12,000 years ago, and the Laschamp event, which occurred around 41,000 years ago, were geomagnetic excursions. These events are characterized by temporary changes in Earth's magnetic field's strength and direction without a complete reversal of polarity.
THEN A DISCONNECT OCCURRED IN THIS PART OF THE ANSWER
The Gothenburg event and the Laschamp event are separate instances of geomagnetic excursions, and there is no direct connection between the two. However, they both highlight the natural fluctuations in Earth's magnetic field that have occurred throughout its history.
Studying these geomagnetic excursions is crucial for understanding the role of the magnetic field in shaping Earth's environment and the potential impacts of future changes.
No connection? I wanted to attempt to establish an approximate 12,000-year timeline for excursions, to connect them together as events in a 12,000-year cycle with the machine. So Iwent to the next excursion on the list and asked about Lake Mungo.
Describe the Lake Mungo event 24,000 years ago. Was it a geomagnetic excursion?
The Lake Mungo event, which occurred around 24,000 years ago, is not a well-known geomagnetic event like the Gothenburg event or the Laschamp event. Instead, it refers to a period of significant climate change in Australia.
During the Lake Mungo event, the climate of Australia went through a dramatic shift, transitioning from a wetter, cooler period to the hotter, drier climate that characterizes the continent today. This change is believed to have had a significant impact on the flora and fauna of Australia, as well as the indigenous peoples who lived there.
The Lake Mungo event is not a geomagnetic excursion, as it relates to climate change rather than fluctuations in Earth's magnetic field. However, it is an important event in the history of Australia and serves as a reminder of the dynamic nature of the Earth's environment and the need to adapt to changing conditions.
During the Lake Mungo event, species extinctions were recorded in Eurasia, as well as climate changes in Australia. Please comment.
Apologies for the earlier confusion. The Lake Mungo event, which occurred around 24,000 years ago, was indeed a period of significant climate change in Australia. The event led to the transition from a wetter, cooler period to the hotter, drier climate that characterizes the continent today.
This change in climate is believed to have had a significant impact on the flora and fauna of Australia, as well as the indigenous peoples who lived there. However, there is no direct evidence of species extinctions in Eurasia during the Lake Mungo event. Climate change and species extinctions in Eurasia are more commonly associated with other events, such as the Younger Dryas period, which occurred around 12,900 years ago.
The Lake Mungo event is an important reminder of the dynamic nature of Earth's environment and the potential impacts of climate change on various regions around the world. It also highlights the need to study and understand the complex interactions between climate, geography, and the distribution of species across the globe.
The End of the Chat
We took AI to school. Everyone can take AI to school on the platform of their choice, and get AI involved in the analysis of this vital issue. AI is ignorant without us. We are AI. Interact only to your benefit, and be selective when using AI, whenever and wherever possible. Protect your data.